

musk wanted the govt to spend less, trump wanted it to spend more
musk wanted the govt to spend less, trump wanted it to spend more
yeah I didn’t think of that
deleted by creator
I dont think it changes my pov, but it def does for other people on a large scale
you could say the same message in different parts of the same thread, and by chance one will accumulate more downvotes and one will accumulate more upvotes
for example: https://sh.itjust.works/post/39444493/18993947 and https://sh.itjust.works/post/39444493/18993522 say the same thing, but one has 42 updates and 8 downvotes and one has 120 downvotes to 23 upvotes
people need to stop looking at these numbers
probably some way to extert real power, like if it controlled a vast sum of money
and it would need to have a bunch of really complex economic models and tons of computing power
no simple answer to this, I like the question btw
what if it was made of helium though
that stuff doesn’t burn
best cheating strategy
just allocate some of those funds to providing food for every student
yeah 90%+ of the cost would be covered and the rest would be small enough that it wouldnt place a financial burden on anyone
Honestly thought there were gonna be downvotes on this one
same but I still wanted to say it. ngl I kinda believe a lot of people base their opinion of what someone is saying just off the upvote/downvotes ratio without thinking about it as much as they could, so the upvotes on this one may have been caused by the first few people seeing it agreeing with it
by making sure they cant spend their money on stuff their not supposed to, like buying politicians
then work harder against corruption
doesn’t need to be
go get money out of politics
remove citizens united and all that
I’m okay if billionaires exist, but their political and economic power should be somehow kept in check
just wait till the revolving door starts moving…
Yet we can’t land on the fucking moon?
there’s less money being thrown at it nowadays, so that cant make it much easier
I’m not sure you understand that anyone can afford to pay a small enough sum for food
the point isn’t that the money will cover the cost
if lunch costs less than a dollar every single kid will be able to pay that and if they don’t their teacher could easily provide because of how small a sum of money that is
everyone has at least a dollar
and if they don’t then have the lunch be further subsidized
but the cost should be just above $0
LLMs have a use case
But they really shouldnt be used for therapy
I think school lunch should cost something, but very little, just so the kids can understand the value of money
like a dollar per lunch isnt that much at all
but it shouldn’t place a large financial strain on poor families
edit: I honestly feel like a lot of you are simply looking at the upvote/downvotes ratio and basing your reaction off that rather than the content. If the lunch is cheap enough, everyone will be able to cover it, but I’m advocating for making it cost slightly more than zero
what did they do now…